Full analysis
Your M.I. report
Working intelligence and Empathy are your joint strengths.
100M.I.
Sample preview — no payment was made.
Experimental, non-clinical interpretation. The norms are still simulated, so use this report to support reflection and discussion—never as a diagnosis or as the basis for an employment decision.
- Base score
- 100 M.I.
- Meta Bonus
- +0
- Estimated percentile
- P50
- Status
- Provisional
The essentials
Working intelligence and Empathy are your joint strengths.
Working intelligence is your main strength in this attempt, supported by empathy. Recall is the lowest-scoring dimension here: an area to develop, not a fixed limit.
Empathy
102 M.I.Recall
96 M.I.Your combination
Lead through human complexity
You combine several operational constraints with attention to the people affected by the decision.
A 8-point spread shows a profile with a clear emphasis that does not depend on a single dimension.Your profile
Five dimensions, applied to real situations.
Every dimension is shown in the same unit: M.I. points. Raw accuracy and scoring adjustments are shown separately to distinguish scores from percentages and percentiles.
01Main strength
Working intelligence
104 M.I.- Raw item accuracy
- 80 %
- Pace and confidence adjustment
- -1 pts
- Items completed
- 6/6
Manage a complex problem without losing track
It comes into play when you must keep several constraints in mind, combine them and still reach a decision.
Statement for job applications“I can structure a complex problem without losing its essential constraints.”
Potential pitfall
When the mental load is high, you may keep the reasoning in your head instead of making it visible to others.
Try this
Before tackling your next complex task, write the constraints, non-negotiables and required decision on a single page.
02Main strength
Empathy
102 M.I.- Raw item accuracy
- 70 %
- Pace and confidence adjustment
- -1 pts
- Items completed
- 6/6
Read another person without treating signals as facts
It comes into play when your next step depends on another person’s feelings, intentions or point of view.
Statement for job applications“I can read interpersonal signals without treating an interpretation as fact.”
Potential pitfall
Recognising a signal does not reveal its cause: a useful interpretation remains a hypothesis to confirm.
Try this
In three conversations, separate the signal observed, your hypothesis and the question that could verify it.
03Main strength
Adaptation
101 M.I.- Raw item accuracy
- 68 %
- Pace and confidence adjustment
- +2 pts
- Items completed
- 5/5
Change approach when the facts change
It comes into play when feedback invalidates the initial plan and you need to develop a better strategy quickly.
Statement for job applications“I can revise an approach quickly when the facts contradict it.”
Potential pitfall
Adapting does not mean changing at every signal: the useful habit is deciding what truly warrants a change of course.
Try this
Before a task, write down the initial plan and the exact signal that would make you change it.
04Additional strength
Lucidity
99 M.I.- Raw item accuracy
- 75 %
- Pace and confidence adjustment
- -2 pts
- Items completed
- 6/6
Separate what is solid from what is merely plausible
It comes into play when an inconsistency, missing information or an overconfident conclusion has to be identified.
Statement for job applications“I can separate what is established, assumed and still missing.”
Potential pitfall
Checking becomes expensive when applied everywhere. Its value comes from slowing down where an error would matter.
Try this
For three decisions, use three columns: facts, assumptions and missing information.
05Area to develop
Recall
96 M.I.- Raw item accuracy
- 65 %
- Pace and confidence adjustment
- -5 pts
- Items completed
- 5/5
Retrieve information when it becomes useful
It comes into play when a decision depends on a detail, a precedent or information encountered earlier.
Statement for job applications“I can retrieve and apply useful information after an interruption.”
Potential pitfall
Memory benefits from a system: relying on recall alone can make an accurate detail hard to share or verify.
Try this
After a meeting, recall five key points without using your notes, then check them ten minutes and twenty-four hours later.
What shaped your score
The evidence behind the number.
The conclusions below are based only on the score contributions recorded during your assessment. They reveal neither the expected answers nor any private question-bank content.
Your strongest contributors
Working intelligence and empathy make the two strongest contributions in your profile.
Priority area
Recall is the lowest dimension within your own profile. The aim is not to “fix” it, but to manage it effectively when a situation makes it important.
Item groups assessed
Constraints and rules
Keep several rules active without dropping one.
3 itemsMissing information
Notice when a certain answer is not yet possible.
4 itemsRule switching
Drop a rule that no longer fits.
2 itemsThese values group item families from this attempt. They are neither calibrated subtests nor stable traits.
How you responded during this attempt
Reported confidence
Average confidence 73.2% · average credit 72.9% · 28 responsesYour average confidence and earned credit were close on the responses that asked for a confidence estimate.
Changes of mind
7 answers changed · 7 changes in total7 answers were changed and received an average of 67.1% of the available credit, compared with 74.9% for unchanged answers. Because the first selection is not retained, this difference does not show whether changing your mind helped or hurt.
For your applications
Turn your profile into concrete evidence.
A score alone proves little. Use it to open the conversation, then support it with a real situation.
Design and problem solving
- Engineering and software development
- Systems architecture and design
- Strategy and operations consulting
- Applied research and R&D
“My M.I. profile is led by working intelligence, supported by empathy.”
Prepare an example in which you coordinated conflicting constraints until a clear decision emerged.
What tools does the team use to retain and retrieve important knowledge?
These are directions to explore, not predictions of aptitude or success. The certificate verifies the attempt and score; it does not replace a qualification or evidence of your work.
Try this week
Three practical exercises—not just good intentions.
Each action produces something concrete: an example, a check or useful information about a role.
- 0120 min
Turn your strength into a story
Prepare an example in which you coordinated conflicting constraints until a clear decision emerged.
Expected outcome: a 90-second example structured as context, action and verifiable effect. - 0210 min × 3
Strengthen recall
After a meeting, recall five key points without using your notes, then check them ten minutes and twenty-four hours later.
Expected outcome: three recorded situations, including what worked and what remains difficult. - 035 min
Assess the work environment before choosing it
What tools does the team use to retain and retrieve important knowledge?
Expected outcome: concrete information about the real conditions of the role, not just its title.
Beyond the expected answers
What else you noticed
The bonus remains separate from the base score and never changes the estimated percentile.
Total Meta Bonus+0
- Clue in the interface
- +0.8
- Answer outside the visible frame
- +1
Method and traceability
- Generated on
- 3 August 2026
- Question bank
- 3.9
- Scoring model
- 3.0
- Norm set
- development-3
- Result fingerprint
- sample-profile-not-certifiable
- Calibration
- Provisional
Verifiable document
Your certificate
Create a verifiable A4 certificate. It confirms the score and states how many attempts were recorded in this browser when the certificate was issued.
Certificate creation is disabled in this sample preview.